53 pages 1 hour read

How to Be Both

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2014

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Impact of Grief on Personality

The impact of grief is a major focus of the novel, as protagonists have their identity and outlook affected by the losses they suffer. George is introduced in the aftermath of her mother’s sudden death, and much of her character development through the novel revolves around her coming to terms with the loss and relearning how to connect with people around her. Francescho, on the other hand, suffers from the existential grief of having lost his own life, though with the blow softened by his faded memories and the distraction of a “purgatorium” observing George. He also recalls impactful losses throughout his own life, such as the death of his parents.

As a young girl, Francescho suffered terrible grief after her mother’s death, as evidenced by her determination to wear her oversized clothes. Her father was determined to honor his wife’s wishes and get Francescho a proper education, and he thus convinced Francescho to abandon her female identity and live as a man to do so. As such, Grief lies at the root of the adult Francescho’s gender identity and his career success.

After the death of his father, Francescho reportedly had trouble sleeping, and the artwork that is so closely tied to his sense of self became “bitter” and “unfamiliar” to him. So impactful was Francescho’s grief that his friend Barto concocted an elaborate ritual to help him regain control of his memories, evidence of Barto’s deep care for his friend. 

The death of Carol Martineau had an undeniable impact on all three members of her immediate family. Her son Henry shows clear signs of chronic emotional upset due to his grief, describing the memory of his loss as akin to “an earthquake” and relying of George for consolation and comfort. George’s father turns to alcohol to cope with his grief, thereby both parentifying and alienating his daughter George. And George is herself deeply affected by grief, as evidenced by changes in her character between the present-tense narrative and her memories of life before her mother’s death. The intermingling of current and remembered events throughout Part 1 suggests that George’s grief is so profound that it has scrambled her sense of time, leaving her shuttling between past and present, unable to trust in the future. George pursues her mother’s interests—including her mother’s nemesis Lisa Goliard—in the unconscious hope of reviving their connection. The concealed leak in George’s bedroom roof is an important symbol of the self-destructive and negative outlook brought about by her grief. The fact that she eventually allows her father to fix it, abandoning fantasies of rot, ruin, and starlight, does promise that although the impacts of grief are heavy, they are neither permanent nor unassailable.

Ambiguity as an Inescapable Feature of Life

Ambiguity is a fundamental theme in the novel, hinted at even in the book’s title How to Be Both and in its structure, divided as it is into two parts focused on two very different protagonists. Francescho’s own shifting understanding of his gender identity—mirrored in his initial uncertainty about George’s gender—is the clearest example of ambiguity in the book, but other forms of ambiguity abound, interrogating the boundaries between artist and audience, reality and fiction, experience and imagination. 

There is no set reading order for the book’s two parts, and two versions of the book are always produced so that half of published copies begin with “Camera” and the other half with “Eyes.” Consequently, uncertainty is a fundamental characteristic of the novel. Many elements of the story are left open to interpretation, and certain key questions are left deliberately unanswered, for instance Francescho’s own understanding of his gender identity, whether Carol Martineau was really being spied on by Lisa Goliard and the government, and the exact nature of Francescho’s “purgatorium” afterlife. Ambiguity is therefore omnipresent.

Hypothetical and rhetorical questions, imaginary scenarios, and meta commentaries on the blurred lines between reality and fantasy are liberally present throughout the book. Many of these discussions and suppositions are rife with dramatic irony, particularly when revisited. George and her mother discuss the unlikely possibility of Francescho being a woman, Francescho wonders at the ambiguous relationship between George and Lisa, and while George is preoccupied with government surveillance, she is in fact being surveilled by an intangible and inescapable viewer in the form of Francescho. Fact and fiction are further conflated by the fictionalization of the historical figure Francesco del Cossa in Part 2, as well as the inherent ambiguity and uncertainty of his role and perspective as an intangible spirit. Past and present are also conflated by a stream of consciousness narration built around memories, with the present tense narrative often interrupted by recollections of the past. George’s grief initially means that she lives as much in the past—trapped in her memories of her mother, yearning to return to the time before her mother’s unexpected death—as in the present. In “Eyes,” Francescho exists simultaneously in the “purgatorium” of the 21st century and in his memories of his own long-ago life. In Francescho’s mind, the 21st century and the 15th century exist simultaneously, and he moves seamlessly between these disparate worlds. Even the nature of his posthumous existence—whether he is a supernatural being in his own right or a product of George’s imagination—remains deliberately unresolved. As with many other seemingly either/or questions in the book, the answer is both.

The Power of Art to Transform and Preserve

Art features prominently throughout How to Be Both: In “Camera,” protagonist George is a budding artist captivated by the work of little-known Renaissance master Francesco del Cossa, while in “Eyes,” Francescho himself is the protagonist, inventing his own identity and winning freedom in an often oppressive society through art. In both halves of the novel, works of art and the act of creating are shown to have great power, capable of both transforming and preserving the viewer, artist, and subject.

For Francescho, art is inextricably linked with identity. Francescho’s own life was transformed by his artistic ability and his dedication to the arts, which saw him abandoning a conventional life to live as a man and a painter. His art is his legacy, and the source of almost all extant information about him. It therefore serves to preserve his memory. In life, Francescho’s art transforms and develops alongside his character, reflecting his state of mind and preoccupations—particularly his grief. Francescho preserves many people from his life in his art—Barto, Isotta, the field worker, the boy with the torch—but in preserving these people in art, he also transforms them. His art also has transformative power over those who see it. Many of his friends and lovers in the brothel choose to change their lives as a result of the altered and elevated sense of self produced by his sketches, and the workers of Ferrera are inspired and moved by the depiction of one of their own in the palace frescos.

Characters connect with each other through shared experiences involving works of art. The impact and connotations of these pieces therefore change along with developing relationships, even as art functions to preserve and strengthen those bonds between people. In her grief, George listens to 1960s music, dances the twist, and watches vintage French films in order to feel close to her mother. She also cultivates a deep interest in the work of Francesco del Cossa because of her mother’s interest in this artist, regularly skipping school to spend hours observing his portrait of Saint Vincent Ferrer. In this way, George uses art to strengthen and preserve their close mother-daughter bond. By sharing these artistic passions with H, George also sees their relationship strengthen and transform.

Everyday Resistance to Injustice

Smith provides numerous examples of injustice and misused power throughout How to Be Both, from the abuses of Borso d’Este in Renaissance Italy to governmental misconduct and extra-judiciary surveillance in the modern-day UK. The novel’s characters resist and critique injustices in their lives through habitual acts of defiance.

Carol Martineau, George’s mother, worked as an online activist as well as a political and economic commentator to critique and expose injustices perpetrated by the UK government and to resist wider social inequalities. She wrote articles, created and distributed online Subverts (a play on the UK colloquialism “adverts,” or advertisements), and once engaged in an act of protest by attempting to write “liar” on a window behind which a prominent politician was speaking. Her strong sense of justice and dedication to activism are the result of her 1960s upbringing and her first-hand experience of the abuses of Thatcher’s right-wing government in the 1970s and 1980s. It is because of her defiance and dissent that both George and her mother believed Carol to be the subject of government monitoring. Although the narrative never absolutely confirms or refutes the characters’ suspicions, H’s easy acceptance of the conspiracy communicates just how feasible and commonplace such surveillance is in the modern world. George resists and defies the perceived injustice of the monitoring by reversing the subject of observation and stalking Lisa Goliard in turn.

Francescho defies the injustices of his society every day by living as a man and working as a painter rather than submitting to oppressive cultural and social expectations for women. He also critiques injustice through his work, thereby undermining existing power structures. Francescho’s work on the fresco in Piazza Schifanoia included many components that defied convention and criticized normalized injustices, particularly following his disillusionment with the Duke. His inclusion of racially diverse figures taken from the lowest classes of society, figures who would not normally be depicted in “high art” in positions of power and esteem—Isotta as a muse and the field worker as a symbol of strength—is in itself an act of defiance and protest. The inclusion of his own knowing eyes above the deliberately inverted head of the Duke, a silent protest against the man’s injustice and hypocrisy, is another act of resistance. The effectiveness of these small, non-violent acts of protest is confirmed by Ercole’s testimony of the fresco’s wide renown and undeniable impact on those who seek it out.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock Icon

Unlock all 53 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 9,150+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools